The concept of a simulation that predicts and prevents terrorist attacks instantly evokes Minority Report, and the connection is even made by an expert early on in the documentary Simulating Religious Violence. No precogs were involved, and there is no seeing into the future, but rather a team of computer scientists, religious scholars, and sociologists work together to create a simulation to identify patterns of radicalization and emotional vulnerability. Their goal is to better understand what draws individuals into extremist religious movements and to develop tools and strategies that might help governments and communities prevent future violence.
Director Jenn Lindsay quickly frames a narrative where no one blames religion itself, with several experts acknowledging that nearly all faith traditions have experienced violent offshoots or had atrocities committed in their name. Many experts note that extremism often takes root among those who feel socially or culturally excluded, particularly second- or third-generation immigrants still seeking a sense of belonging and purpose in a country that often views them as outsiders. Extremist groups recruit the disenfranchised by offering an inviting community and the promise of working toward a higher purpose. The film also notes that this tactic has fueled the recent growth of violent far-right groups.
The documentary’s most powerful moments come when it leans into empathy. The film opens with interfaith leaders reflecting on the Boston Marathon bombing, emphasizing compassion over condemnation. Later, researchers stand before literal mountains of life jackets from Syrian refugees, and after such trauma, several Syrians are seen worshipping together, showing the more hopeful aspect of religion. These scenes humanize the project’s data-driven core, underscoring how understanding and connection can counter radicalization more effectively than fear or surveillance.
While its subject is undeniably compelling, Simulating Religious Violence maintains a distinctly academic tone throughout. Much of its 60-minute runtime is devoted to the methodology behind constructing and analyzing the simulation, with only occasional moments of emotional resonance. For some viewers, this emphasis on process may feel clinical or removed—but educators and librarians will likely recognize it as intentional. The film is designed not to entertain, but to inform, offering a clear-eyed look at the mechanics of radicalization and the possibilities of preventative intervention. Still, some editing choices—such as overlapping voiceovers with footage of the same expert speaking—can feel slightly disjointed, and the film’s most affecting moments don’t always fully connect with its central focus. A few more scenes that explore the lived experiences of those vulnerable to radicalization could have further grounded its thesis in emotional context. Recommended.
Is Simulating Religious Violence a good resource for academic librarians and educators?
Still, the documentary excels as an educational film. It offers a rare bridge between technology, theology, and social science, illustrating how empathy can shape digital innovation. For academic librarians, the film is well-suited to religious studies, political science, computer science, ethics, and sociology courses. It can also enhance media literacy discussions by showing how simulation can serve humanitarian, not just analytical, goals.
How can Simulating Religious Violence enrich library programming?
For library programming or community screening initiatives, this title aligns well with themes of empathy, interfaith dialogue, and global understanding. It could pair effectively with The Route: From China to America for a program on migration, belonging, and the social roots of violence. Public libraries can use it to encourage dialogue about diversity, radicalization, and how technology can foster inclusion rather than division.
So Fare Films
So Fare Films
So Fare Films
So Fare Films
Enjoyed this review? Subscribe to Video Librarian today for access to over 40,000 pages of film resources tailored for librarians, educators, and non-theatrical audiences.